I consider this to be among the worst espionage movies ever made. Anyone familiar with the original television series from the 1960s, starring Sir Roger Moore (who later achieved worldwide fame portraying another charming secret agent, James Bond), will recall it fondly. It was likely one of the finest European productions of its time and a significant success. I haven't managed to watch the entire show yet, altho…

This film really resonated with me; I consider it delightful and captivating. There's something about it that pulls me in when the weather turns colder, likely because a significant portion takes place in Moscow. Val Kilmer’s character has an almost heroic quality, carrying the weight of past trauma. Elizabeth Shue portrays a beautiful and fragile presence that works well alongside Kilmer’s assuredness. The antagonis…

It's certainly not a cinematic masterpiece, yet I find myself returning to this film repeatedly—perhaps three or four times across the years. It’s generally enjoyable, even though the script contains some truly weak lines. Still, Val Kilmer is good in the central role and he has several pleasant moments with Elisabeth Shue. **3.5/5**

It was an enjoyable film that I’d happily watch again, though I can’t wholeheartedly suggest it to others. The movie certainly shows its age. Val Kilmer seemed to be benefiting from his role in "Batman," and several Hollywood actors appeared to be attempting to establish themselves as the next action or spy star—perhaps in an attempt to challenge Tom Cruise's dominance, which didn’t really succeed. This interna…

This film doesn’t feel like a “The Saint” movie to me. It bears very little connection to the character of Simon Templar as portrayed in the Roger Moore TV series. I haven't read the original books, so I can’t comment on how faithful it is to those stories, but I was let down by seeing a Simon Templar who wasn't really…himself. I’ve never been particularly fond of Val Kilmer’s performances, and I don’t believe he’…