It proved to be an agreeable action-comedy, though it definitely has a feel reminiscent of films from the 1990s; I found myself enjoying it largely because of Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz. The script still carried a slight artificial quality that’s been appearing in Netflix productions lately, but even so, it didn't significantly detract from how much fun I had. **3.5/5**

I experienced *Back in Action* as something of an inconsistent film. It’s hard to say that I truly enjoyed it, but at the same time, it didn't leave me with a strong dislike either. The whole thing just felt underwhelming across the board. The return appearances of Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz are what make it appealing. Foxx and Diaz both deliver acceptable performances; Diaz’s is slightly better than Foxx’s. McKe…

"Back in Action" has a distinct resemblance to something cheaper than "True Lies." It doesn't bring anything new or inventive to the table like the 1994 film that it superficially copies. That’s not to suggest it’s terrible; as a straightforward action movie, it provides some mild entertainment. However, you quickly realize you’ve seen this all before, because you probably have, in various ways. Basically, it's…

A more fitting name for "Back in Action" might be "Out of Action." Seth Gordon’s attempt to blend action, comedy, and heartfelt moments falls short, resulting in a movie that is easily overlooked and feels very predictable. Cameron Diaz's comeback doesn't quite work out, as the film does not do justice to her abilities or those of the other actors involved. It has difficulty justifying its length and ultimately le…