It's a genuinely enjoyable film that I’d happily watch again and suggest to others. I would even say this version is better than the original from 1967. While it isn't quite as endearing as the earlier movie, and its animation style is noticeably different, both possess an impressive level of detail. You can really appreciate the cg effects—from the individual strands of fur to the variety of animals depicted (…

It's certainly a worthwhile film to watch with the family. I’ve noticed some people tend to measure it against the earlier animated version from Disney, but in my view they are distinct films and shouldn't really be held up next to each other. While I haven't read the book, I suspect this adaptation adheres more faithfully to its narrative. It possesses a slightly darker tone, feels considerably more serious, and is …

My biggest problem with Jon Favreau's _Jungle Book_ feels a little unfair to bring up, but it’s also pretty significant. For ages before seeing this remake, I kept hearing about how wonderful an actor the boy playing Mowgli was, and how realistic the animals looked, and that you wouldn't be able to tell the backgrounds were animated sets. After watching _The Jungle Book_, I discovered those praises weren't really …

The adventures of the red flower! Rudyard Kipling’s well-known children's story has been adapted for stage productions, television series, live-action and animated films, and now here is a modern version that also marks the first time in 3D digital format. Disney has once again brought classic stories to life, and it was clearly a collaborative effort, with particularly impressive post-production work. It's one…

This is a wonderful film suitable for everyone in the family. You can find a more detailed look at it on my website, linked here.