W2TCH

The Big Sleep (1946)

1946 • 1h 54m • Thriller, Crime • NR
On September 26, 2026
#1425▲ 2
1425th by Pulse movie online
47.6PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on The Big Sleep

6/10 · Feb 8, 2024

It’s disappointing that a script of this caliber held back what could have been a truly remarkable movie. I generally enjoy noir films; the style really appeals to me. However, despite its strong reputation, I didn't find myself particularly enjoying this film. It is well-made and delivers everything you’d expect from a noir production. The main issue lies with the script and the story it attempts to convey. That’s not something I’m prepared to overlook easily, especially considering the high level of production and the involvement of talented professionals. The film itself is visually striking. The black-and-white cinematography is exceptionally elegant, and the lighting is beautifully done. The image quality is sharp, resulting in some truly well-composed and framed scenes; it would be difficult to improve upon them, and being more critical would feel unfair. The orchestral score also deserves recognition, enhancing each scene with a sense of dignity and significantly amplifying the dramatic tension at times. The sets are meticulously designed, the costumes are superb (Bogart’s costume is particularly noteworthy, embodying the classic detective image with a fedora and trench coat), the cars are wonderfully stylish (I'm admittedly biased as a fan of vintage automobiles from this era), and the props are all excellent. The quality of the cast’s performances truly elevates the film; in a lineup led by Humphrey Bogart, no one feels wasted or underutilized. Each actor had opportunities to shine and demonstrate their talent, which suggests that director Howard Hawks skillfully managed his resources. As is often the case, Bogart doesn't disappoint: he’s comfortable in these roles and adept at portraying them, bringing a balanced mix of cynical humor, restrained heroism, and well-intentioned brutality to the character. He delivers some of the film’s most memorable lines. Martha Vickers also stands out; her role was brief and cut during editing, but she is captivating and alluring. Lauren Bacall, who was romantically involved with Bogart at the time and would later become his wife, makes a strong impression, although I've seen her deliver stronger performances elsewhere. What’s lacking is a villain of comparable strength and charisma. The film falters significantly in its script, which presents a convoluted and disconnected narrative centered around the two indulged daughters of a wealthy retired general. The story is treated with an almost disrespectful lack of care, and I had to work hard just to understand what was happening. Honestly, it might have been better not to try; the story itself is weak and underdeveloped, which feels unacceptable for a production of this caliber. I’m unfamiliar with the original source material, but I know that it has inspired other films and adaptations. Regardless, I can't simply accept it. It shouldn’t happen. Still, things are as they are, and it’s unfortunate to see a film with so many positive attributes undermined by such a glaring flaw.

Source on TMDB