The theatrical origins of this production are immediately apparent. The script relies heavily on dialogue to explain events happening beyond the confines of what’s essentially a single apartment room. While not inherently problematic, this approach shapes the film’s overall tone. It feels more like an intellectual puzzle than a suspenseful whodunit. Perhaps casting Tony as a chess player instead of a former tennis star would have been a better fit, given his intricate schemes and calculated maneuvers. Even the murder scene itself is presented in a stylized manner—the initial shock of the stabbing is somewhat theatrical, leading to a prolonged and dramatic demise. I consistently find myself wondering about the film’s depiction of England in 1954, specifically the notion that citizens were obligated to document every banknote they received or spent. I can't say whether this was genuinely accurate at the time, but it strikes me as peculiar and improbable. It isn't a major issue, but the conversations surrounding money feel out of place. Despite its merits, the film isn’t without shortcomings; some camera angles seem oddly chosen, and Grace Kelly doesn't appear to be fully utilized in her part. Margot’s passivity makes it difficult to believe she would willingly pursue an affair and then act so casually about being with both her husband and former lover. My comments might suggest I didn’t enjoy the movie, but these are simply minor imperfections within a truly excellent film. Hitchcock's ability to communicate volumes through subtle facial expressions is remarkable.

Source on TMDB