I won’t discuss the historical aspects; my work involves that area, and frankly, I don't really care about it. This series seemed to aim for a Tarantino-esque style, and we all know how he handles history. So, I went in expecting the historical elements to be deliberately inaccurate... and I wasn't wrong. However, I’m a big fan of both Al Pacino and Quentin Tarantino, so I was really looking forward to this because it appeared to be an enjoyable imitation of Tarantino's work—which is essentially how it presents itself. The truth is, *Hunters* feels scattered. It seems like it genuinely wanted to emulate Tarantino’s style, but similar to "2 Days in the Valley," it doesn't quite grasp what makes his approach successful. It struggles to blend humor and violence effectively, resulting in a chaotic feel. The characters and storylines don't connect beyond superficial interactions; the violence lacks that enjoyable quality, and as a consequence, the other attempts at humor miss the mark and seem awkward. Then it incorporates political commentary reminiscent of Jordan Peele’s work—something I hoped it would avoid based on the promotional material. Instead, it does, adding to the disjointedness with a narrative where white characters are portrayed as Nazis and inherently evil. Honestly, I'm weary of that trope, and I suspect that once this “woke” trend fades and open bigotry isn’t fashionable, like many of Peele’s films, it will be viewed as racist.

Source on TMDB