It's difficult to be sure about what "Worldbreaker" intends to communicate. The film presents a scenario where, in the event of war and significant male losses, women are expected to take on the responsibility of defending the world. This seems to align with the present-day Western viewpoint concerning potential dangers from countries like Russia and China—a narrative that may lack substantial evidence but could become reality if aggressive policies are pursued. The situation is further complicated by the fact that there aren't enough men in the West available for mandatory military service, raising questions about who would fill the ranks next. Setting aside this possible reading of the story, how well does the film function on its own terms? Honestly, it feels quite sluggish. Progress is slow, and when something finally happens, it isn’t particularly engaging. The positive aspects include strong performances from the actors, varying from good to exceptional. The visual effects for the creatures are believable, though they aren't frequently displayed. Ultimately, what point is this film attempting to make? Maybe I’m misinterpreting things—I truly hope that’s the case. Regardless, it’s a rather slow science fiction survival story, and its quality mostly rests on the solid acting of the principal cast members. It’s barely worth watching.

Source on TMDB