I understand why people might say this is derivative—it borrows heavily from films like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, which was itself an extremely important horror movie. However, many horror movies feel similar these days. There are exceptions, of course; "The Exorcist" comes to mind as a film with a distinct storyline, but those kinds of movies are uncommon and frequently imitated by people who call themselves “Horror Fans.” In the end, The Hills Have Eyes is comparable to Wrong Turn. Friday the 13th shares similarities with countless other slasher films, and even Halloween, considered a classic in the genre, isn't entirely unique. I just don’t see what the big deal is regarding originality. It's certainly unoriginal, but it’s surprisingly well-acted, and the filmmakers used darkness effectively to make up for their limited resources. It incorporates familiar elements of the horror style, and honestly, as a low-budget imitation, it could have leaned into those tropes even more intensely. The performances were quite good. The director and cinematographer demonstrated skill in crafting a decent horror film despite their budget constraints; they knew how to conceal details and reveal them at appropriate moments, which is hard to criticize. I’m awarding it a full 10 out of 10 because it achieved its purpose. Ultimately, what does anyone expect from a movie like this—something truly original or revolutionary?

Source on TMDB