This movie stands out as a concerning example of how carelessly cinema can deliver messages to audiences. I’ve expressed in previous reviews that I view movies as both entertainment and an art form. At its heart, this film fits that description. However, it's increasingly difficult to ignore the fact that many films attempt to push political or social agendas, and the movie industry’s ability to influence large groups of people is a powerful tool—one that can be used for positive or negative purposes. The message conveyed in this film demonstrates a significant lack of social responsibility! Released in 1978, during a period when American cinema still reflected hippie ideals and the values of a libertarian and counterculture Left, the movie introduces two very different characters – a poor Latino man and a wealthy, privileged individual – who share a passion for drugs, particularly marijuana. The script feels underdeveloped; the characters are primarily focused on an endless pursuit of more and more substances, ultimately returning from Mexico with a van filled with weed, leaving behind a trail of unintentionally stoned people who seem remarkably content. This is one of those films Hollywood should feel ashamed of: it’s essentially an endorsement of drug use, ranging from marijuana to acids, stimulants, and heroin. The sheer number of drugs mentioned is extensive, and the way the topic is handled warrants legal action and arrest warrants for the actors, producers, studio, and director, as accountability for this irresponsible and pointless movie is needed. If you find that assessment too extreme, consider: would it be acceptable to release a comedy that presented Nazism or the Holocaust in a sympathetic light? While those things aren’t directly comparable, there are limits to what's appropriate, even in comedy, and certain subjects simply shouldn't be treated as humorous. I don’t believe this film caused an increase in drug use, nor do I think everyone who saw it went out and bought marijuana. But allowing reprehensible actions and behaviors to be portrayed casually can gradually become normalized within society. Beyond the issue of moral and social irresponsibility, the movie also features humor that is simply in poor taste: I’ve never seen a film with so much time spent in bathrooms or depicting characters vomiting. If that's intended as funny, it missed the mark for me—though perhaps my perspective is flawed; after all, I wasn't raised in isolation and received a good education. Technically, the only noteworthy aspects are the vehicles, from a VW Beetle modified with Rolls-Royce parts to the overwhelmingly green van featured throughout much of the film. Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong absolutely deserve a Golden Raspberry award, both as actors and comedians. I personally believe this film should be banned for moral and educational reasons. However, it could potentially be viewed if presented within a proper context and accompanied by explanations about the dangers of drug use. Fortunately, there are many films with positive messages on that subject; yes, cannabis is a drug like any other.

Source on TMDB