Unthinkable poses a difficult question that has occupied many people worldwide for quite some time, particularly since the events of 9/11: Is it ever justifiable to torture someone in order to save numerous lives? And if so, what are the limits? This is an undeniably sensitive topic, and I think it takes considerable courage for any filmmaker to present it openly, as Gregor Jordan has done. It’s also noteworthy that he avoids taking a definitive stance, instead allowing the audience to form their own opinions and feelings—a bold and controversial approach. Essentially, this film centers on a man of American descent who converted to Islam and subsequently planted three nuclear bombs in major U.S. cities as an act of terrorism, with detonation scheduled in four days. The screenwriter, Peter Woodward, made some deliberate choices regarding the characters; they are somewhat stereotypical, but that seems intentional. Carrie-Anne Moss portrays an FBI investigator representing conscience, sensitivity, and the struggle to make the right choice. Samuel L. Jackson is her opposite: a ruthless, logical interrogator who does what he must because he’s the only one capable and willing. The methods he employs to extract information from his subject are almost as disturbing as they are shocking. It's possibly the most brutal film I have ever witnessed, largely because the depicted actions are based in reality. These tactics do occur, and they are far more unsettling than any typical horror movie due to their emotional impact. Intelligence agencies worldwide employ these techniques, regardless of our beliefs. All of this sounds like a great opportunity to address an important issue and prompt thoughtful consideration, doesn’t it? One would hope so; however, there's a significant problem: the writing isn't strong enough. Despite their best efforts, the filmmakers fail to generate empathy for either side. Not for the terrorist, due to the lack of background or motivation, nor for those attempting to thwart his plans that could cost millions of lives. Carrie-Anne Moss’ character, Brody, in particular, becomes frustrating; while her internal conflict is understandable because she's a decent person, she comes across as naive from a professional standpoint—unwilling to sacrifice one life to save many. Her constant interference gradually becomes irritating, to the point where you just want her to step aside. However, Jackson’s character, H., proves so volatile that you almost begin to feel sorry for the terrorist! There's one scene in particular that is truly jarring and leaves you unsure of what to think. I won't reveal specifics, but it involves the terrorist’s wife—consider this a warning; it’s deeply unsettling. The other characters are as lifeless and unimportant as cardboard cutouts; I’ve already forgotten most of them, but they aren’t essential to the story anyway. The film could have still been worthwhile if not for one major flaw: the disappointing ending. It's so hollow and unsatisfying that you’re left wondering why you just spent an hour and a half watching someone being tortured if there was no purpose to it! It might have had value if the filmmakers had shown some conviction, but they don’t. Why did the terrorist commit his actions? We don't know. Did the agents achieve anything? Not really. So what’s the point? There is no point; it’s simply 90 minutes of torture, poor decisions, and failure. Overall, it isn't entirely without merit. The dialogue is often quite good, and despite the script's flaws, there are some powerful scenes that draw you into the minds of the characters. The actors do their best with what they’re given; Samuel L. Jackson remains reliably excellent, and Carrie-Anne Moss is convincing in her role, which makes me sad to think she hasn’t had many memorable parts since *The Matrix* and *Memento*, because she's a talented actress. Michael Sheen, as the terrorist, also performs well, although it’s difficult for him to portray his character as fully realized due to the lack of background or development provided by the writers; nevertheless, he effectively conveys his character’s emotions in each scene. Ultimately, I wouldn’t necessarily discourage anyone from seeing this film; you now know what to expect and it does offer some interesting points for reflection. However, be prepared—this is a challenging film, both mentally and emotionally. And definitely don't watch it if you are under 18.

Source on TMDB