“Under the Skin,” directed by Jonathan Glazer, comes with considerable praise and a reputation for being high art, but it doesn’t quite live up to expectations. It's certainly made skillfully, though the movie illustrates that impressive technique isn't enough on its own to make something truly imaginative. Mica Levi’s unusual score contributes to a disturbing mood, and the use of covert cameras produces moments that feel like genuine documentary footage—though they don’t reach the standard set by Werner Herzog. Scarlett Johansson gives a committed performance that is both physically challenging and largely without spoken words, and this should be acknowledged. Still, in its attempt to convey deep meaning, "Under the Skin" reuses ideas and methods that other filmmakers have handled with more intention and innovation. The sparse dialogue doesn't connect emotionally like it does in films by Kim Ki-duk. Its abstract visuals seem uninspired when compared to truly experimental movies. As a story about finding humanity, it’s not as thought-provoking as Yorgos Lanthimos' "Poor Things." What’s most frustrating is the film’s overly serious tone. Glazer seems to confuse being difficult with having depth, and slow movement with thoughtful consideration. The idea of an alien trying to understand humans isn't bad in itself, but “Under the Skin” doesn’t provide a new take on this familiar science fiction concept. In movies, technical skill should support the story and its ideas, not take their place. "Under the Skin" is watchable, but just barely, presenting impressive work that ultimately fails to produce any meaningful insights. The film leads to an ending that feels neither justified nor insightful—like a complicated border around a blank piece of artwork.

Source on TMDB