W2TCH

Twelve Monkeys (1995)

1995 • 2h 9m • Thriller, Science Fiction • R
On September 24, 2026
#931
931st by Pulse movie online
54.2PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on Twelve Monkeys

9/10 · Nov 16, 2022

**A remarkable science-fiction movie that warrants our attention.** I wasn’t sure what to anticipate when this film appeared on television recently, but I found myself completely captivated from beginning to end thanks to an engrossing narrative and a cast of talented performers who deliver strong performances. While I'm not deeply familiar with director Terry Gilliam – I've only seen one or two of his films so far, excluding this one – I’m starting to grasp his artistic vision. Still, I acknowledge that the surrealism he employs, along with the unusual script, can make it challenging to fully comprehend the work. The film plunges us immediately into a bleak and oppressive world where humanity was nearly wiped out by a pandemic. As the disease originated from an airborne virus intentionally released, survivors retreated into underground shelters. Advanced technology allows for the dispatch of chrononauts – time travelers – to the past in order to retrieve pure samples of the virus, which can then be utilized to create a vaccine or medication. This is how James Cole, a convict, is selected for time travel in exchange for a pardon. His mission isn't to alter history by preventing the initial release; even though he seems inclined to do so. Instead, it’s to locate those responsible and relay information back to the future, enabling another agent to collect the samples. He only knows that a radical environmentalist group, the Army of the Twelve Monkeys, was involved. Sent mistakenly to 1990 rather than 1996, he ends up in an asylum where he befriends Jeffrey Goines and forms a connection with Dr. Railly. The film explores complex ideas such as time travel, temporal paradoxes, the impossibility of changing the past, and even madness—the fragile distinction between reality and imagination, or sanity and insanity. It features numerous jumps forward and backward in time that require close attention, but what most viewers will find intriguing is its abrupt and perplexing conclusion. I understood it fairly well, and I believe attentive viewing is all that’s needed for comprehension; however, I'll offer a hint: pay attention to the protagonist's eyes and those of the child at the film’s end—they are identical, and what she sees aligns perfectly with a recurring nightmare that torments the protagonist, originating from the future. I won’t say more. I thoroughly enjoyed Brad Pitt’s performance in this movie. The actor, typically cast in charming roles where he can leverage his natural appeal, is almost unrecognizable here. He's younger and less seasoned, but equally impressive. I don’t know to what degree participating in this film contributed to his development as an actor, but I suspect it was beneficial for Pitt. Bruce Willis also deserves recognition for his work; he convincingly portrays confusion, often conveying the impression that his character is surrendering to events while resisting when their mission is threatened. Madeleine Stowe's performance wasn’t quite as compelling: While certainly acceptable, it felt less distinctive and more conventional. Technically, the film is flawless. Gilliam creatively utilizes sets and costumes to create a truly strange and bizarre future, complete with those plastic protective suits and that ball used during interrogations. It’s an unpleasant world we hope never to experience. I especially appreciated the cinematography and how the director manipulates the footage to enhance the surreal and unsettling atmosphere. For instance, the scene on the staircase of Goines' father's mansion is both elegant and majestic while also being labyrinthine and dreamlike. In addition to the effective special effects, the film features a very impactful soundtrack.

Source on TMDB