It's relatively recent that we've seen gay romantic comedies appear as a movie genre, and they are still working out the kinks, with some being more successful than others. Generally, they seem to be getting better over time, though certain productions could still use some polish. This is true of actor-writer-director Max Talisman’s first film, which has positive qualities but also areas that need attention. Essentially, this romantic comedy centers on two men named Zack—one experiencing heartache (Talisman) and the other stuck in a disappointing relationship (Joey Pollari)—who meet and develop feelings for each other. However, their romance follows a familiar, somewhat dull, occasionally sentimental romcom storyline that lacks originality, regardless of the sexual orientation of those involved. The plot also includes several stereotypical characters and situations, which feel predictable and not particularly well-developed. Furthermore, many of the actors’ performances—particularly among the supporting cast—feel exaggerated or unnatural, both in their over-the-top portrayals and the dialogue they are given to deliver. That said, the film does feature a number of genuinely funny, clever one-liners that create vivid imagery, prompting viewers to wonder about their origins. Despite the screenplay’s frequent reliance on those stereotypes, there are also many creative and humorous moments related to gay experiences that appear unexpectedly, generating laughter at times when it's least anticipated. It is encouraging to see a gay film that incorporates realistic characters—like a plus-sized male lead (Talisman) who develops an entirely believable relationship with an ordinary guy (Pollari)—without making a big deal out of the fact that they represent an unconventional pairing for a gay movie, one that avoids relying on conventionally muscular actors in the leading roles. So, what does this mixed bag of qualities mean for audiences? I felt like I was watching a recorded version of a script's initial draft—a film with potential but needing refinement in its writing, acting, character development and overall narrative structure. However, as is to be expected with new cinematic genres that are still evolving, there will inevitably be setbacks, and “Things Like This” is no different. The same applies to the work of a first-time filmmaker who’s trying to find his footing behind the camera. Nevertheless, there's promise here, even if there’s plenty of room for improvement to reach its full potential.

Source on TMDB