W2TCH

The Tempest (2010)

2010 • 1h 51m • Fantasy, Drama • PG-13
On September 23, 2026
#9690▲ 22713
9690th by Pulse movie online
13.5PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on The Tempest

2/10 · Jul 31, 2022

The movie seemed initially promising, but ultimately fell short of expectations. I’ll admit I hadn't read _The Tempest_ before seeing this adaptation, so I had to familiarize myself with Shakespeare’s original play beforehand. I generally enjoy William Shakespeare’s works and have read several of his plays. It’s also clear that some of the most passionate defenders of his writing can be wary of film adaptations. While I understand their concerns, I also recognize the need for changes or cuts when adapting a work to the screen. One particularly striking alteration in this case was changing the central character's gender; traditionally male, the role was well-played here by Helen Mirren. The story essentially follows events that most people will likely know better than I do, given my lack of familiarity with the source material: Prospera, the Duchess of Milan, is exiled from her lands by King Alonso of Naples and her brother Antonio. Accused of witchcraft, she escapes with her daughter Miranda and finds refuge on an island inhabited by a creature named Caliban. Twelve years later, Miranda has grown into a beautiful young woman ready for marriage, and fortune seems to favor Prospera again when the men who orchestrated her downfall are aboard a ship that is caught in a magical storm, forcing them ashore on her island. The film is watchable, but it suffers from a common problem with movies based on theatrical material, especially Shakespearean adaptations: it feels artificial and overly staged rather than naturalistic. Film demands actors behave as if they aren’t performing on a stage. If I wanted to see the play itself, I would have purchased tickets for a theater performance. While director Julie Taymor attempted to remain faithful to the dialogue and original text, she should have made necessary adjustments, striving for greater authenticity and realism in both the lines delivered and the direction of the scenes. The affected delivery and complex language don’t suit a cinematic work. This explains how much the cast's efforts were hampered by the material they had to work with. There are several talented actors involved, but the final product doesn’t quite live up to their abilities. Helen Mirren is excellent as Prospera; it was a bold choice for her and the director, but she rose to the challenge. Djimon Hounsou also deserves recognition; his portrayal of Caliban demonstrated impressive physical presence and vocal control. Ben Whishaw delivered an interesting performance as well, though it was somewhat restrained and heavily reliant on CGI. The rest of the cast fulfilled their roles adequately. On the downside, Felicity Jones lacked a certain spark and charisma, while Reeve Carney’s performance felt overly sweet and idealistic. Technically, the film is disappointing and often feels like an unfinished project. The cinematography is subpar; it's puzzling why they didn’t opt for a more vibrant, colorful, and visually striking style that would have allowed the CGI to shine and showcased the Hawaiian landscapes more effectively! The editing is unremarkable, and the movie’s pacing is slow at times, which can be tiring. While some costumes attempt to evoke the Renaissance period, the actors' clothing lacks historical accuracy. There’s a noticeable amount of green screen usage, but the visual and sound effects are weak, and the CGI appears amateurish.

Source on TMDB