The opening line sums up what the movie is about: survival comes before everything else. While the title gives a hint of what’s to come, experiencing the story firsthand is essential to understanding how events unfold. The film explores a world where humanity's evolution has altered the natural order—what happens when established rules revert to their original form? Set in a post-apocalyptic Britain, it centers on three individuals battling for survival each day. This marks the director’s feature film debut, and they also crafted a notably strong screenplay. Though similar films exist, each possesses its own narrative with unique challenges and threats. Changes in circumstances lead to different outcomes, offering viewers fresh perspectives and entertainment value. It felt unlike anything I'd encountered previously; it was unflinching in depicting the harsh realities of its world. Trust among people has vanished—a common trope in post-apocalyptic stories, but presented here with striking detail. The near absence of background music created a powerful effect, amplifying the tension and lending scenes a documentary-like realism. The story follows a man living alone in the woods, cultivating his own food while constantly wary of external dangers. His solitary existence is disrupted when a woman and her daughter arrive seeking to trade valuables for supplies. The initial interaction doesn’t go smoothly, but they eventually build trust and begin sharing resources. As expected, food scarcity becomes an ongoing problem, and the ensuing difficulties drive the plot forward. > "The only thing I have caught in there walked on two legs." It's a film with a small cast and minimal dialogue, relying heavily on visual storytelling. While I enjoyed it, it didn’t become a favorite—simply a well-made thriller. The actors may not be household names, but they are recognizable faces, and their performances contributed positively to my experience. Although critically praised and popular among moviegoers, the general public, crucial for commercial success, overlooked it. It received a BAFTA nomination in the newcomer writer/director category but didn't win. The central theme revolves around food—a resource that rapidly dwindled due to overpopulation, pollution, and related issues entering the twenty-first century. The premise is relevant, yet many viewers seem to prioritize entertainment over grasping its underlying message. I hope you won’t use that as an excuse to dismiss it. Filmed in Northern Ireland and surrounding areas, the film unfolds at a deliberate pace, steadily conveying its message. It's not about how familiar the theme is, but rather how differently people confront such situations—a perspective conveyed through dramatic storytelling. The poster initially suggested a narrative rooted in Native American or South American cultures, primarily due to the characters’ hairstyles. The synopsis offered a different interpretation, making it more intriguing. I approached it with low expectations given its lackluster reception, but was pleasantly surprised by its originality. It presents an interesting perspective on how these three individuals grapple with their circumstances. While not essential viewing, it's certainly not among the worst films out there; I suggest doing some research if you’re unsure whether to try it. If pressed, I would recommend giving it a chance. _7/10_

Source on TMDB