It’s an impressive movie, certainly well-made and of high quality, though ultimately I found it unremarkable. I've honestly lost track of how many films about Nixon I’ve watched. And that makes sense! Few presidents in American history have generated as much controversy as he did. He was a president who not only wielded his power fully but also abused the privileges it afforded him, and the media became one of his most significant adversaries. This film distinguishes itself by shifting the focus away from Nixon or Watergate themselves, instead centering on the key figures at The Washington Post in the period leading up to the scandal, when the paper was being sued by the White House. It’s not a groundbreaking concept, but it's enough to set it apart. The script isn't without its shortcomings; one issue seems to be an attempt to incorporate the theme of gender equality within a corporate setting. This arises as we see male characters struggling to accept direction from a woman who is clearly their boss and owner of the company. While the 1970s were pivotal for the feminist movement, it was often driven by a younger, more rebellious generation, and the role of established women like the Post’s owner might not have been as widely recognized. However, this theme feels somewhat tacked on and ends up underdeveloped when she essentially states, “the newspaper is mine, I make the decisions, and whoever doesn't want to follow them can leave.” That decisive statement abruptly resolves the issue. Regarding historical accuracy, I am not qualified to comment; I cannot assess whether the film accurately portrays the events. The film’s greatest strength lies in its exceptional cast. Steven Spielberg delivers assured direction, creating a solid film that will nevertheless be considered a relatively minor entry in his filmography. The performances are anchored by Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep, and it's unnecessary to point out that this isn't a particularly memorable role for either of them. It likely represented a financially sound opportunity for them, as it undoubtedly did a privilege for the rest of the ensemble, who had the chance to observe their methods and learn from practical experience—lessons not typically found in acting classes. Technically, the film has a pleasing warmth, like that third cup of tea left too long on the stove, growing cold but also richer. That’s the best way to describe my impression: the atmosphere and subject matter give it weight and tension, though without creating an unsettling feeling because they are handled with restraint, presented in a measured fashion. The recreation of the period looks good, although it was necessary and couldn't be avoided. Williams’ score is forgettable, even disappointing considering his usual abilities. There’s a clear ambition present in this project; the producers knew they were making something substantial, but the final result didn’t quite live up to their expectations or prove particularly memorable.

Source on TMDB