This second "Pink Panther" installment is noticeably worse than the first, even with a large cast who try their best to prevent it from being a complete failure. Following the success of the initial film, making another one felt inevitable, as an attempt to revive a franchise that had thrived thirty years earlier thanks to Peter Sellers' talent. Despite widespread negative reactions, the film was still made, but failed to address the shortcomings of its predecessor. The positive aspects I appreciated in the first movie are still present here, but the problems and less enjoyable elements have become even more pronounced. Steve Martin remains a highlight for me. While some may disagree, I believe he performed adequately and fulfilled his role well. However, it’s clear that the material he was given wasn't strong, and the jokes intended for the character are uninspired and rely on tired tropes common in American comedies. Jean Reno and Emily Mortimer return, both receiving more attention, screen time, and importance to the story, doing their best with what they have. The inclusion of John Cleese was a welcome addition, as I sensed genuine chemistry between him and Martin. Alfred Molina, Lily Tomlin, Andy Garcia (who delivers an acceptable but not remarkable performance), Jeremy Irons in a brief appearance, and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan – chosen, it seems, primarily for her beauty – also contribute to the cast. While the quality of the acting has improved, with almost everyone giving a reasonably solid effort, this can’t be said about the script; it doesn't provide them with anything truly worthwhile. The script is the film’s biggest issue: the story is too unrealistic and far-fetched to be believable. It starts with the flimsy premise of an “elite” group of international detectives, full of egos, forced to collaborate on solving a series of crimes seemingly committed by one person! This doesn't make sense, just like the stolen items—priceless works of art and historical artifacts—fail to generate genuine interest in the thief (unless the intention was to demand a ransom for their return). There are also details that simply don’t work: Clouseau apparently has no idea who the Pope is, for example. Technically, the film closely resembles its predecessor; the cinematography and visual style are reasonably well-executed, and Paris looks beautiful on screen. The opening credits are once again very good, and Mancini's theme music is used effectively. However, beyond that, the film lacks a compelling soundtrack, and what’s present isn’t particularly memorable or well-integrated. The editing feels awkward, and the pacing is uneven; it lingers too long on unimportant scenes while rushing through moments that deserved more attention. The special effects aren't impressive, and overall, the movie looks cheaper and less polished than its predecessor.

Source on TMDB