The film centers on two women working across different time periods to protect someone they care about. It went through a lengthy development process, spanning over ten years and involving several changes in casting and production companies. Initially planned as a collaboration between Indian and Australian filmmakers, a Belgian company eventually joined the project. After overcoming numerous obstacles, it was finally completed. The movie is an Anglo-Indian historical romance-drama set during British rule in India, dealing with themes of betrayal, political maneuvering, revenge, and a journey. It also incorporates a modern storyline about an archaeological couple who find a lost ancient Indian jewel while exploring a shipwreck, which then shifts the narrative back to India. The story begins well, but later elements feel off. I’m puzzled by the use of Chinese music in a film set in 18th-century India; it doesn't quite reflect Indian culture or identity within the context of the story. Those unfamiliar with both Chinese and Indian musical styles might not notice, though. Furthermore, characters who are supposed to be Hindu and Indian soldiers wear Persian costumes and use Persian weaponry. It’s strange that a place name like 'Dragon's Throat' would appear in an Indian setting or be used as a surname for Indian characters within a princely state. These kinds of details feel inaccurate, especially if you’re familiar with the region. It seems the filmmakers did inadequate research; hiring an Indian musician, costume designer, and historian could have helped. > "Love has many faces, > and one of them is jealousy." The production quality was high, and the actors gave strong performances. However, I found Bipasha Basu's facial expressions distracting—she seemed to maintain a consistently sad expression throughout. This aligns with her character’s development, so it wasn't necessarily a flaw in her acting. It marked her international debut, but the film’s release was underwhelming because of the weak and somewhat silly storyline. I hadn't seen historical settings in India portrayed outside of Indian films before; the locations were impressive, and the visuals successfully recreated what the subcontinent might have looked like in the 1700s. A significant issue is that viewers are left confused by the ending—the explanation for how the time barrier was crossed to move between timelines isn't clear. The Hindu priest/saint/sadhu’s explanations about space and time felt more absurd than insightful. Ultimately, the film raises more questions than it answers. I wanted to like it; I was excited about combining historical themes with science fiction elements, but the execution fell short. Fortunately, it wasn't the worst movie of the year—I’ve seen films even less deserving of review. I can’t wholeheartedly recommend it, but if you’re curious, proceed with caution. 5/10

Source on TMDB