The film presents something compelling, though it feels rooted in an earlier time. In 2003, political perspectives were notably different; there was broader agreement about criticizing corporate practices, rejecting job outsourcing, and demanding accountability from these institutions. Now, things have noticeably changed. We don’t see that same level of opposition anymore. Nike, for example, continues its reliance on outsourced labor and sweatshops while having become a well-known brand embraced by different viewpoints. Outsourcing is now often accepted among those on the left, with phrases like "the jobs aren't returning, accept it" becoming commonplace—a sentiment that wasn’t present in 2003. It’s striking to observe how some of the individuals who previously voiced opposition are now appearing in media coverage, seemingly endorsing the current corporate landscape. The one exception I recall is Noam Chomsky, who seems to have maintained his stance consistently over the years since the film's release. Despite this change in perspectives among some voices, the documentary succeeds in charting how corporations developed in the United States—from their origins to their emergence as political entities and the impact that legal personhood has had on our politics. There were moments when it was genuinely affecting, especially because of its respectful treatment of corporate employees, including interviews where they voiced similar concerns to those held by protesters but felt obligated to prioritize shareholder profits due to legal requirements. This highlights a frequently overlooked aspect of the discussion. Even now, it’s still worthwhile viewing, even though attitudes toward the topics and corporations featured have changed considerably since its original release.

Source on TMDB