It's a film that possesses certain merits, though it ultimately falls short of its potential. I feel that anyone with even a basic understanding of cinema already recognizes Danny Boyle’s films aren't universally appealing. While “Slumdog Millionaire” might be his most accessible work, capable of reaching a wider audience, considering “Trainspotting” provides insight into how raw and intense he can be as a filmmaker. He seems to enjoy pushing those boundaries, and there's clearly an audience that appreciates this kind of film. The story unfolds in Edinburgh, centering on three young friends sharing an apartment. As is common among people facing financial hardship, they split the rent to stay afloat, and are looking for another roommate because space allows it. However, after just a week, their chosen companion turns up dead next to a large suitcase full of money. This leaves them grappling with a difficult choice: should they contact the authorities and explain what happened? After all, they didn't kill him! Or would it be better to conceal the body and keep the cash? They desperately need it… is it worth risking everything? As you can see, the film delves into themes of greed, pettiness, friendship, and how a situation like this can alter relationships, ultimately ending them and fostering intense paranoia fueled by unspoken fears. There’s something reminiscent of Alfred Hitchcock at play here. I think that alone would have made the film worthwhile, but Boyle introduces an unnecessary subplot involving criminals who are aware of the money and relentlessly pursuing it, leaving a trail of bodies in their wake. This addition wasn't needed; the focus should have remained on the central storyline. The biggest drawback is that the characters aren’t particularly likable or the film visually striking. Quite the opposite! They are petty, cynical, and unsympathetic, with their friendship seeming contrived and dictated by circumstance. However, this is precisely what the film had the opportunity to explore fully. It attempts to do so, and the tension gradually builds as a result, but that distracting subplot I mentioned disrupts the flow. Chris Eccleston and Ewan McGregor deliver memorable, slightly unhinged performances, standing out in the cast. Their characters demanded this kind of intensity, and they both rose to meet it, although at times their portrayals felt over-the-top. Kerry Fox’s performance isn't as strong, and she too tends toward exaggeration. Boyle has a distinct style, but he doesn't seem adept at directing his actors. Additionally, Keith Allen is underutilized, and Ken Stott is relegated to a minor role with little impact on the plot. Technically, the film boasts some positive aspects: the set design is well-considered, and the production team made every effort to work within the constraints of their limited budget. The cinematography is good, though not exceptional, and the camera work has moments of creative flair, showcasing unique perspectives and unusual framing. The brisk pace helps mask any shortcomings, making the film more engaging and accessible. The ending feels forced, and the twist was fairly predictable.

Source on TMDB