The pursuit of realism in storytelling often leads writers to immerse themselves in research, sometimes through direct experience, to ensure accuracy. However, regarding Mikko Mäkelä's second film—a work that has received surprisingly widespread praise—I have significant concerns about the approach taken here. The story centers on a promising young London-based author of acclaimed short stories and magazine articles who is beginning his first novel: an intimate look at the lives of gay male sex workers. To understand these experiences, this aspiring writer, Max Williamson (played by Ruaridh Mollica), decides to investigate firsthand by becoming an escort himself, arranging meetings through a website using the name “Sebastian.” As he becomes more deeply involved in his research, he finds it increasingly difficult to maintain control and begins to feel conflicted, sometimes seeming unconcerned about the situation, going to great lengths to conceal both his work as a hustler and even his sexuality. Is he worried about being recognized by clients or colleagues, or is he someone who hasn’t fully embraced himself, a contradiction in itself? Regardless, he has several varied encounters that leave him—and the audience—questioning the direction of the story, including an odd, unexpected romantic connection with an older man (Jonathan Hyde). This combination of conflicting motivations proves to be where the film falters, wandering aimlessly in multiple directions that appear to contradict one another, prompting questions about what the filmmaker and screenwriter intended and how thoroughly they prepared the narrative. “Sebastian” frequently feels like a collection of sexual encounters loosely tied together with a flimsy plot, often relying on tired, familiar tropes from older gay-themed cautionary tales. The film also includes some unrealistic scenarios involving the publishing industry, which further damages its believability. Considering all this, it's difficult to understand why the movie has garnered so much praise, particularly as a potential contender for awards. In my opinion, this release requires substantial revisions—not only to create a more concentrated storyline but also to develop characters who feel more authentic and establish a stronger connection with viewers. There are many excellent LGBTQ+ films deserving of recognition these days, but this one certainly isn't among them.

Source on TMDB