This film represents another unsuccessful effort to emulate Spotlight, largely because of its excessive self-importance. In contrast to Spotlight's emphasis on the mechanics of journalism without portraying the reporters as central figures, this movie succumbs to a pattern of celebrating them and creating exaggerated "reveal" scenes against the backdrop of the Prince Andrew controversy. The narrative prioritizes elevating the journalists above the story itself. This diminishes the seriousness of what’s being explored and redirects attention toward the people involved instead of the core issue. The film's presentation feels overly dramatic, adopting a tone that comes across as lecturing and self-satisfied. This lessens the potential effect of the narrative, transforming it into a showcase for journalists acting as champions rather than an examination of their discoveries. A better strategy would have been to concentrate on how the investigation unfolded and allow the story to develop organically. By avoiding sensationalism and maintaining a realistic depiction of journalistic practices, the film might have achieved a more genuine and impactful account suitable for a wide audience. Ultimately, this movie’s attempt to highlight journalism doesn't succeed because it overemphasizes heroic elements and dramatic presentation. It fails to convey the principles of journalistic integrity and commitment that films like Spotlight demonstrated so effectively. A shift toward less glorification of the reporters and more attention to their detailed work could help future movies in this genre sidestep these problems and present stories with greater significance and lasting power.

Source on TMDB