I’m approaching this solely as a movie, so my assessment is purely based on its entertainment value and technical merits, setting aside any historical or religious considerations. The narrative itself wasn't poor; it unfolds in Israel during 33 AD, centering around a Roman man recounting his experiences. It feels like an unauthorized continuation of 'The Passion of the Christ', picking up where Yeshua’s crucifixion left off. After securing the tomb with a Roman seal and posting armed guards, Yeshua’s body vanishes. Amidst growing rumors and instructions from superiors, Roman soldiers under Clavius begin searching for it, pursuing various clues. The remainder of the story becomes a race against time, filled with surprising and unusual occurrences. The setting was ideal for this kind of story. While the characters were well-developed, the film ultimately raises questions about their motivations and actions. It’s presented from a Roman viewpoint, charting his evolving beliefs. The depiction of events had good detail; it uses straightforward storytelling without elaborate action sequences or special effects. However, there's a point where it struggles to reconcile its realistic tone with supernatural elements. Because the filmmakers avoided referencing established accounts, its interpretation is open to discussion, though not necessarily worthy of intense debate. People’s perspectives on religious, historical, and entertainment aspects will naturally differ. Nevertheless, this film has something for every audience. Films like this are valuable because they offer unique interpretations of the figure at the heart of the world's largest faith. Whether someone enjoys it or not is a matter of personal opinion and should be determined after watching. I found it to be quite enjoyable overall. 6/10

Source on TMDB