Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010) seems constructed primarily for its 3D presentation, and this proves to be both what makes it work and where it ultimately falls short. The narrative takes a marginally improved path compared to the earlier sequels, partly due to W.S. Anderson’s return as director, though it still doesn't have much substance. It emphasizes action and visual displays over compelling storytelling, prioritizing elaborate set pieces. Experiencing it in 3D allows the visuals and effects to truly pop, creating a sense of involvement that helps cover up its shortcomings; however, when viewed in 2D, the film loses considerable impact and feels more like something out of a video game than a proper movie. The camera work and editing are noticeably more restrained than in the previous two installments, making the action at least bearable without being completely overwhelming. Slow motion is employed frequently, perhaps even too much, but it functions as intended when seen in 3D. A particularly striking moment occurs during the chained hammer attack, which provides a noteworthy example of how to use 3D effectively and genuinely elicits a response from the audience. Although the direction shows improvement, the writing remains basic, providing just enough plot progression without any real depth. Milla Jovovich once again anchors the film, keeping it engaging with her performance and well-choreographed action sequences. The other actors are present, but none of them make a lasting impression. The music maintains the industrial rock sound, which suits the movie’s tone. Ultimately, Afterlife is centered around its 3D spectacle. Watching it as intended provides an enjoyable, action-filled experience. However, when viewed in 2D, the weaknesses become much more apparent, significantly diminishing its quality once its main draw is removed.

Source on TMDB