It seems Disney took some lessons from the initial movie and delivered something improved this time around. This is the expected follow-up to “Planes,” a computer-animated film released by Disney that didn’t quite live up to expectations. I actually found it to be an improvement over the first one, which suggests the studio at least paid attention to some of what went wrong before. The story begins well, with the main character unable to participate in races because of a significant mechanical problem. This situation leads him to a new path: becoming a firefighting plane. The film possesses something that was missing from its predecessor: genuine emotion. It's more heartfelt, with greater emotional depth and visual appeal. While there isn’t as much action, the sense of peril and danger is heightened, showing planes battling blazes and facing risks to rescue others – a lovely recognition of the work done by real-life firefighters and pilots. However, there’s one flaw that the script can't hide: the story is predictable; it functions adequately but lacks originality or fresh ideas. The animation and graphics remain impressively high quality, demonstrating Disney’s expertise in digital animation. The film has a realistic visual style, and while there’s more tension and risk involved, it also feels calmer than the first movie did, without the same frenetic pace. The editing and length are well-suited to the kind of film this is, and the musical score is more impactful and refined compared to before. The voice cast performs admirably, bringing life to the animated characters. Dane Cook reprises his role as Dusty, continuing to do a great job; Ed Harris’s deep and powerful voice was ideal for Blade Ranger. I also appreciated the performances of Julie Bowen, Teri Hatcher, Wes Studi, Hal Holbrook, and Stacy Keach.
On September 25, 2026
#3339▲ 8340
3339th by Pulse movie online46.4PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →


