The musical output of Pink Floyd stands on its own merits; adapting it into a movie feels like an unnecessary endeavor. I’m unsure if the members of Pink Floyd fully grasped the significance “The Wall” would hold when they initially released it. Presently, there’s widespread agreement that it's among the greatest rock albums ever made, and "Another Brick in the Wall" has evolved into a rallying cry for teenage defiance against established norms. I feel comfortable stating this because rock music isn't really something I gravitate towards personally; I listen to it occasionally, but I wouldn't purchase a ticket to see it performed live. The film essentially translates the album’s concept—which was conceived and presented as an opera-rock—into a visual style that is utterly surreal and dreamlike. There isn't really a conventional storyline beyond what unfolds in the mind of the protagonist, Pink, a rock singer struggling with profound depression. This isolation stems from a combination of factors: the absence of his father (who died in wartime during his childhood), an overbearing mother, harsh educators, and a recent separation. Experiencing the film is akin to witnessing a musical nightmare. It’s not a feel-good movie, nor is it easily digestible, particularly given the lack of clarity in the plot and absence of any explicit explanations. While there are some powerful moments, I'm uncertain if this would be appropriate viewing for sensitive viewers. Numerous sequences depict war, the abuse of power, and manipulation. The animated segments are also effective, though they’re as unsettling as everything else. Ultimately, that’s what the film is: Pink Floyd’s music brought to life visually. It will likely resonate with fans of the band and rock enthusiasts in general, but others might find it doesn't warrant their time.

Source on TMDB