This entry in the Disney series is easily the weakest of the three. 'Angels in the Infield' feels like an even more labored experience than 'Angels in the Endzone', and that’s saying something considering how far removed it is from the original movie, 1994's 'Angels in the Outfield'. I simply didn’t find much to appreciate here; it’s an unremarkable and foreseeable 87 minutes, regrettably. The one aspect that stood out as preferable compared to the other sequel is the group of performers involved. Patrick Warburton (as Eddie), David Alan Grier (Bob), and Kurt Fuller (Simon) represent a noticeable step up from the cast in the 1997 film. I’m familiar with all three actors from their other work, which helps, but they are better than Jack Coleman and his colleagues—though they don't exactly deliver show-stopping performances. Christopher Lloyd is absent this time around, which isn’t unexpected. The acting talent is the only redeeming quality to point out, though it’s a limited one at that. There are several drawbacks, most notably the continued inability to refresh the core concept—the sports elements remain essentially unchanged from the other two films; they could have made some alterations. Another problem lies in the plot involving baseball (which they return to, by the way), and while there’s a touch of sentimentality between Eddie and his daughter, Laurel (Britt Irvin), it's a straightforward story that required more fleshing out. It isn’t terrible, owing to the cast and the somewhat touching storyline, but that doesn’t mean it’s something I would suggest seeking out; I wouldn’t advise watching it.

Source on TMDB