The defining element of this film is undeniably "Heartland." There was a time when Michael Moore seemed dedicated to representing the concerns of everyday, Middle American workers. Films such as “Sicko” addressed their healthcare issues, while “Capitalism: A Love Story” advocated for their jobs and financial security. However, this latest work didn’t resonate well, particularly in the heartland—and that's because he appears to have drifted away from being an advocate for blue-collar, working-class Americans. It seems like he has ceased to pay attention to what they are saying, and his concern for their challenges related to poverty has diminished. In this film, Moore’s presence felt different; he didn’t sound like the Michael Moore people were accustomed to. He no longer conveyed the voice of someone speaking with the working class; instead, he sounded like one of those individuals from coastal areas who speak down to them rather than engaging with them.

Source on TMDB