W2TCH

Look Who's Talking Now! (1993)

1993 • 1h 36m • Comedy, Romance • PG-13
On September 27, 2026
#5633▼ 3240
5633rd by Pulse movie online
42.5PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on Look Who's Talking Now!

2/10 · Jun 23, 2022

This isn’t a worthwhile film. Following a pattern, a third installment was created to complete a series that had already started to falter with the previous film. This one felt like an attempt to correct past missteps, but instead confirmed that there wouldn't be another movie in the franchise. The quality is low, and it’s even more disappointing when put next to the earlier movies. A flawed and inconsistent script is its main issue, though the jokes also fall flat and fail to engage viewers. The story involves Mollie and James dealing with money problems and relationship issues after she loses her job and stays home, which means James has to take a position offered by Samantha, a young, wealthy woman who attempts to ruin their marriage, causing jealousy and instability at home. They also adopt a stray dog, who becomes the central figure in the film and develops a humorous rivalry with Samantha’s poodle. Like most romantic comedies, it's clear from the start that things will eventually work out, despite some predictable complications. John Travolta and Kirstie Alley are back in their roles, but they don’t live up to their earlier performances. They seem conscious of the film being a misjudgment and perhaps shouldn’t have been made, or at least not made as it is. Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton lend their voices to the dogs, trying their best to salvage the situation, but the script lets them down. Lysette Anthony's performance doesn’t add much beyond irritation. From a technical standpoint, it’s just as unremarkable as the others: the cinematography offers nothing new or special, and the sets and costumes are exactly what you would anticipate. The music is decent, but not good enough to make watching the film worthwhile.

Source on TMDB