It seems they simply couldn't resist bringing him away from his island home... King Kong is directed by Peter Jackson, who also co-writes the screenplay with Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens. The film draws its story from Merian C. Cooper and Edgar Wallace. The cast includes Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody, Thomas Kretschmann, Colin Hanks, Andy Serkis, Evan Parke, Jamie Bell, and Kyle Chandler. James Newton Howard composed the music, and Andrew Lesnie was responsible for the cinematography. Following his success with the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Peter Jackson decided to create a new version of this classic creature feature, King Kong. With all the latest filmmaking technology available, Jackson aimed to make a Kong film that showed respect for the original 1933 movie while also putting his own stamp on it. The basic story remains the same: a group journeys to a legendary place called Skull Island, where they encounter strange creatures, including an enormous gorilla. They foolishly bring him back to America in pursuit of profit, and things quickly go wrong. That’s the gist of it. I've found it particularly interesting revisiting the film after almost 15 years, especially considering we recently had another Kong reboot with "Kong: Skull Island" in 2017. The differences between the two films are significant, for better or worse depending on your preferences regarding Kong stories. “Kong: Skull Island” is a straightforward action adventure—full of thrills but not very deep, and aware of that fact. Jackson’s Kong had loftier ambitions, aiming to be more thoughtful, and largely succeeds in this goal. However, it takes a considerable three hours for the film to reveal its intentions, which was an issue when it came out in 2005 and remains a hurdle now—even knowing how long it is going in. It's frustrating because there’s a truly excellent movie buried within, just weighed down by unnecessary scenes and awkward dialogue that could have been cut. Once the initial setup is complete during the first hour, we finally arrive at Skull Island, which is an absolute technical marvel. The visuals are stunning, and the introduction of Kong and his companions is very well done. From this point on, it's creature feature mayhem; the beauty-and-the-beast dynamic comes into play, and it’s all quite enjoyable and exciting—with one exception. A dinosaur stampede looks ridiculous, and the combination of live actors and CGI is so poor that it undermines the money spent on special effects for this production. Aside from that, though, the action sequences are gripping, especially the monster battles. The quieter moments on Skull Island also resonate strongly, those scenes where Kong and Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) simply relax together, appreciating the landscape that greedy people want to steal Kong away from... Then it shifts back to America, and chaos ensues, culminating in a brilliantly staged final third of the film. All that meticulous period detail is destroyed during the battle between humans and Kong, and even now I’m hoping he wins! As the tenderness of the Beauty and the Beast storyline fades—and it truly is beautiful—you realize once again that Jackson allowed himself to get carried away. The cast performed well; Serkis's portrayal of Kong is a revelation. It's a wonderful film at times, a real treat in High Definition, if only someone had kept him from indulging so much. Then we might have had a 9/10 movie instead of a bloated 7/10 one.
On September 24, 2026
#858▼ 59
858th by Pulse movie online54.4PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →


