“Jason Bourne” feels like a spy movie crafted for people who struggle to grasp complex ideas. The entire thing comes across as simplistic, relying on a vocabulary seemingly limited to that of a young teenager and repeating itself endlessly over two very long hours. Bourne is constantly being chased, throwing punches, and escaping—shoot, bleed, run, escape; shoot, bleed, run, escape; it's a cycle that goes on forever. I genuinely felt sorry for the actors who had to deliver such weak dialogue; their characters practically narrate every action as it happens (“It’s Bourne!” “I’m going to shoot!” “He’s running upstairs!”). Eventually, it became almost comical. Matt Damon returns as Jason Bourne, but his performance feels detached and uninspired. Even Alicia Vikander's role is questionable, and her accent seems uncertain. Tommy Lee Jones embodies a stereotypical villainous government official. There isn’t much depth to the characters, and Julia Stiles, a familiar face in the series, is the only one who manages to be enjoyable—though she doesn’t have enough screen time. The action sequences are also badly executed and confusing. Paul Greengrass is among my least favorite directors because of his fondness for rapid cuts that make it impossible to follow what's happening. It’s a filmmaking style designed for people with short attention spans, and I consider it lazy. Greengrass diminishes any potential excitement from the car chase down the Las Vegas strip. Instead of taking care with showing off skillful driving in a smooth, controlled way—like you see in films such as “Death Proof,” “The French Connection,” “Bullit,” “Fast Five,” or even “Bad Boys II”—he once again takes the easy route and presents us with a chaotic jumble of brief clips that appear to be edited together haphazardly. Nothing about this film works: it doesn't offer anything new, lacks energy, and simply feels worn out, making "Jason Bourne" the weakest entry in the series so far. The movie is filled with conversations using spy jargon and technical terms. Quick cuts show someone typing on a computer—beep, boop, beep—followed by shaky camera footage of conversations. Another short conversation, more shaky cam, then a shaky-cam motorcycle chase that makes no sense geographically. It feels as though it was assembled by a seven-year-old with attention deficit disorder who hasn’t taken their medication. The editing is less about crafting something artistic and more about jamming pieces together. It's hard to even call Paul Greengrass the "director." My frequent complaints focus on the overuse of quick cuts and shaky cameras in action movies—it’s a sign of poor filmmaking. When you rely on constant cutting, you don’t need detailed storyboards or actors with fight training, nor do you have to worry about location accuracy. Instead of working hard to create an engaging action sequence, you can just throw things together. Paul Greengrass is the king of this approach. Beyond the poor direction and editing, “Jason Bourne” fails as a spy thriller. The acting is dreadful; Julia Stiles is particularly bad, but Matt Damon, Alicia Vikander, and Tommy Lee Jones aren’t much better. The script is terrible, with characters exchanging technical jargon instead of having meaningful conversations, accompanied by constant beeping noises from computers. Using impressive-sounding words doesn't make a scene compelling, and the plot itself is practically nonexistent. I only found three things to enjoy: the initial fight between Bourne and an unnamed opponent—the one shown in the trailer; the storyline involving a Silicon Valley billionaire who refused to compromise public safety for national security concerns; and the final car chase down Las Vegas Boulevard—which I appreciated despite its terrible editing (and geographical inaccuracies). Let's hope this film doesn’t become a success, because then we’ll see countless imitators trying to copy it, just like happened after “The Bourne Supremacy” and “The Bourne Ultimatum.” Demand better entertainment for your money. There are many movies that do a much better job. If you want an exciting spy thriller with twists and turns, watch the "Mission Impossible" series. For a well-written story of espionage, see “Our Kind of Traitor.” Want impressive fight scenes? Watch “The Raid” films. Even this summer’s “Warcraft” managed to deliver better action than this film.

Source on TMDB