There was talk of an Oscar nomination for this movie. Many critics believed it would be a strong contender, but ultimately, it wasn’t selected. Having now seen it, I feel that it absolutely should have been included. If the exposure of wrongdoing by religious figures can warrant such recognition, then this film deserves it too, as it reveals instances of cruelty directed at economically vulnerable families and older individuals unfamiliar with computers. It's just short enough to be considered a documentary. It felt incredibly authentic, almost like one, aside from the cinematic dialogue. This is a film with an important message, highlighting problems within our systems and those who are suffering because of them. The acting was excellent, and the director, who is 80 years old, did a truly remarkable job. You can watch countless films, but if you don't make time for something like this regularly, there’s not much point in engaging with cinema at all. The story centers around a 60-year-old widower whose name appears in the title. He is recovering from a heart attack and, following his doctor’s advice, has left his job and now receives support allowance. Every time he tries to resolve his situation with officials, they offer different excuses to send him away, clearly frustrated. His lack of computer skills makes it difficult for him to complete forms online. He remains patient and follows their instructions diligently. One day, he offers assistance to a single mother with two children who recently moved to the city from London and is also struggling at an employment agency. Their relationship develops as they help each other through challenging times. The film then focuses on how they overcome the difficulties they face. > "Listen, you know, you give me a plot of land, I can build you a house. But I've never been anywhere near a computer." I enjoyed this film, but found it to be somewhat too realistic for my personal taste. While the emotional moments were very effective, they weren’t particularly sentimental. You could say that less music and more dramatization altered the storytelling style. The focus on those in lower economic classes and their way of life, unintentionally perhaps, highlighted a lack of support within society—all these details were well presented. I consistently support films that expose flaws in societal structures. Nearly every major difficulty someone encounters when dealing with an employment agency, especially older individuals, is depicted. This includes responding to recorded telephone messages, submitting online applications, and attempting face-to-face meetings. What we are currently experiencing globally is the reality that not everyone is computer literate; it may become so in the future, but it isn't yet. These people aren’t receiving adequate assistance, with agencies often treating them as if they were illegal immigrants. The film becomes even more compelling with the introduction of a single mother and her portrayal of the hardships faced by a family struggling with poverty, especially her desperate attempts to provide for her children—this is not just an English problem but a worldwide one. It has received several awards, including a BAFTA award. It’s a worthwhile film for everyone, provided you understand its underlying message; otherwise, it might feel tedious. While watching, I initially assumed it would be a standard drama and anticipated certain plot developments. However, the film largely subverted my expectations until the very end. My advice is to have modest expectations and be patient. More importantly, accept what the film reveals rather than imposing your own desires onto it. If you can’t do that, then this isn't a film for you—and the only way to know that is to watch it. _7½/10_

On September 22, 2026
#6953▲ 322
6953rd by Pulse movie online42.4PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →


