This kind of film tends to divide audiences and critics alike because of its inherent nature. The story itself never breaks new ground or offers anything particularly original. Apocalyptic movies generally stick to a predictable formula, featuring plenty of thrilling action alongside noticeable plot holes, but also with logical inconsistencies. The quality of the visuals varies depending on the studio involved, as do the sound design and other technical elements. I always make an effort to be receptive to whatever illogical things these films throw at the viewer, preparing myself to be as open-minded as possible, and usually, that doesn't cause any problems for me—I often find arguments about scientific accuracy in this genre to be overly critical. However, *Greenland* fails to provide what I was hoping for: a fun, escapist experience centered around a destructive comet. The few positive aspects are the cast and a couple of scenes that genuinely feel exciting. Gerard Butler is familiar with these types of movies (*Has Fallen*, *Geostorm*), so he comfortably portrays another character lacking depth or clear motivations. Morena Baccarin does the same, simply playing Butler’s wife. Both give solid performances, which were enough to keep me interested until the end. The few good scenes are genuinely well-done. Brief glimpses of the giant comet striking Earth before the major event look impressive. Nevertheless, these moments aren't sufficient to fill a 119-minute runtime. As anticipated, Chris Sparling’s screenplay is as generic as it could be, and Ric Roman Waugh’s direction doesn’t offer anything new or interesting. Certain story choices—those unrelated to science or technology, which I accepted as part of the usual illogical conventions—seem solely intended to pass the time because they have no impact on the plot. *Greenland* is much like many other films in the subgenre, but it lacks the technical strengths that would elevate it. The visual effects appear dated in some scenes, almost as if there wasn’t enough time (or budget) to complete them. For example, a still image of a meteor shower in the sky? That feels amateurish and careless. The absence of an impactful score by David Buckley makes the action sequences feel empty, like something is missing. Some fight moments are difficult to see clearly due to the excessively dark lighting and choppy editing from Gabriel Fleming. Overall, the action teeters between decent and disappointing. The biggest letdown comes with the planet-killing comet that everyone anticipates as soon as they enter the theater. There’s no way around it: if a film builds up to a massive comet impact on Europe, it needs to show that impact in all its glory. The huge explosion, the thick smoke filling the atmosphere, the distinctive sound of the collision... this is what can make or break an apocalyptic movie. Unfortunately, I have to say, it broke it. Ultimately, *Greenland* is predictably disappointing, offering only a few genuinely thrilling moments and a capable cast. Gerard Butler and Morena Baccarin do their best, but they aren’t enough to overcome the film's shortcomings. As expected, Chris Sparling’s formulaic screenplay doesn't add a unique storyline or innovative element to the genre, nor does Ric Roman Waugh’s straightforward direction. This would be acceptable if the action sequences delivered what most viewers want, but that aspect is also a letdown. Despite occasional, captivating scenes, the entertainment value remains low due to the uninspired visual effects, lack of an impactful score, and poor editing, culminating in a disappointing finale. If you’re a big fan of apocalyptic films, you might find something enjoyable about it that I missed. However, if this type of movie isn't usually your thing, *Greenland* certainly won't change your mind. Rating: D+

Source on TMDB