This adaptation of "Frankenstein" moves significantly away from Mary Shelly's original story. At its heart, the novel serves as a warning about humanity’s overreaching scientific ambitions, challenging both divine authority and the natural order. The film is generally quite good. The performances are largely excellent, and the creature effects are impressive, but it must be acknowledged that this version has very little in common with Shelly's work. A strained father-son dynamic forms a central theme, drawing parallels to Victor Frankenstein’s own troubled relationship with his father—evident in his harsh and sometimes unkind treatment of the creature he brings into being. Does that make it flawed? Perhaps it hinges on individual perspectives. As someone who greatly admires Shelly's writing, I was actually rereading "Frankenstein" around the time this movie came out, and for me, something felt missing. The bond between the creature and Frankenstein seems considerably less intricate than in the book. The creature from the novel is a tragic figure deserving of sympathy, but also capable of deception and cruelty—qualities that are largely absent here. Victor Frankenstein appears more as someone who made a terrible mistake and doesn’t know how to fix it, rather than as a deliberately cruel person. Ultimately, "Frankenstein" only superficially resembles Shelly's exceptional novel. It is an enjoyable film, without question, but it should be considered separately from the source material. The core message differs considerably. It isn’t quite as nuanced in its portrayal of the connection between Frankenstein and his creation. Still, it's worth seeing.

Source on TMDB