This adaptation of "Frankenstein" moves away significantly from Mary Shelly's original story. At its heart, the novel serves as a warning about humankind’s excessive scientific ambition, challenging both divine authority and the natural order. For the most part, this is a pretty good film. The performances are generally excellent, and the creature effects are impressive, but it must be acknowledged that the movie shares very little in common with Shelly's novel. The story focuses on an unhealthy dynamic between a father and son, which echoes Victor Frankenstein’s own troubled relationship with his parent; he treats his created being harshly and cruelly. Does this make it bad? It really comes down to what you’re looking for. As someone who loves Shelly's work, I was actually rereading "Frankenstein" when this film came out, and I felt something was missing. The bond between the creature and Frankenstein seemed considerably less intricate. The creature in the book is a tragic character, ultimately deserving of sympathy, but also capable of deception and brutality. These qualities are largely absent from this version. Victor Frankenstein comes across more as someone who made a terrible mistake and doesn't know how to fix it, rather than as an intentionally unkind person. Ultimately, "Frankenstein" only superficially resembles Shelly’s exceptional novel. It is a worthwhile film on its own merits, but should be considered separate from the source material; the core themes are quite different. The depth of the connection between Frankenstein and his creation isn't nearly as developed here. Still, it’s worth seeing.

Source on TMDB