This adaptation of "Frankenstein" moves significantly away from Mary Shelly's original story. At its heart, the novel serves as a warning about mankind’s overreaching scientific ambition, challenging both divine authority and the natural order. The film is generally quite good. The acting is mostly excellent, and the creature effects are impressive, but it must be acknowledged that this version shares very little in common with Shelly's work. A strained father-son dynamic forms a central theme, reflecting Victor Frankenstein’s own troubled relationship with his father; he treats his created being with harshness and occasional brutality. Does that necessarily make it bad? It really comes down to perspective. As someone who greatly admires Shelly’s writing, I was actually rereading "Frankenstein" when this film came out, and for me, something felt missing. The bond between the creature and Frankenstein seems considerably less intricate. The creature in the book is portrayed as a tragic figure deserving of sympathy, but also possessing cunning and a capacity for cruelty; these qualities are largely absent from this telling. Victor Frankenstein comes across more as someone who has made a terrible mistake and doesn't know how to fix it, rather than as a deliberately unkind person. Ultimately, "Frankenstein" only loosely resembles Shelly’s exceptional novel. It is an enjoyable film, certainly, but it should be considered separately from the source material because its core message differs considerably. The depth of feeling in the connection between Frankenstein and his creation isn't quite there. Still, it’s worth seeing.

Source on TMDB