This adaptation of "Frankenstein" moves away significantly from Mary Shelley's original story. At its heart, the novel serves as a warning about humanity’s overreaching scientific ambition, challenging both divine authority and the natural order. The film is generally quite good. The acting is mostly excellent, and the creature effects are impressive, but it must be acknowledged that this movie shares very little in common with Shelley's work. A strained father-son dynamic takes center stage, reflecting Victor Frankenstein’s own troubled relationship with his father—a connection damaged by moments of harshness and cruelty toward his creation, brought into being through unnatural means. Does that necessarily make it a negative? It really comes down to personal preference. As someone who greatly admires Shelley's writing, I was actually rereading "Frankenstein" around the time this film came out, and for me, something felt missing. The bond between the creature and Frankenstein feels noticeably less intricate. The creature in the book is a tragic figure, ultimately deserving of sympathy, but also capable of deception and brutality. These qualities are largely absent from this version. Victor Frankenstein comes across more as someone who made a terrible mistake and doesn’t know how to fix it, rather than as an intentionally unkind or uncaring person. Ultimately, "Frankenstein" only superficially resembles Shelley's extraordinary novel. It is a worthwhile film in its own right, but should be considered separately from the source material. The core themes are presented differently. It isn’t quite as nuanced when it comes to portraying the connection between Frankenstein and his creation. Still, it’s worth seeing.

Source on TMDB