This adaptation of "Frankenstein" takes a significant turn away from Mary Shelly's original story. At its heart, the novel serves as a warning about humanity’s overreaching scientific ambition, challenging both divine authority and the natural order. The film is generally quite good. The performances are largely excellent, and the creature effects are impressive, but it must be acknowledged that this movie has very little in common with Shelly's book. A strained father-son dynamic forms a central theme, echoing Victor Frankenstein’s own troubled relationship with his father; he treats his created being with harshness and occasional cruelty. Does that make it flawed? It really depends on what you're looking for. As someone who greatly admires Shelly's work, I was actually rereading "Frankenstein" when this film came out, and for me, something felt missing. The bond between the creature and Frankenstein seems considerably less intricate. The creature in the novel is a tragic figure deserving of sympathy, but also capable of cunning and brutality—qualities that are largely absent here. Victor Frankenstein comes across more as someone who made a terrible mistake and doesn't know how to fix it, rather than as a deliberately cruel person. Ultimately, "Frankenstein" only superficially resembles Shelly’s exceptional novel. It is a worthwhile film on its own terms, but it should be viewed separately from the source material; the core message differs considerably. The depth of the connection between Frankenstein and his creation isn't nearly as developed. Still, it's worth seeing.

Source on TMDB