This documentary film avoids the typical approach of explicitly detailing what’s right and wrong. Instead, it communicates more through visuals than words, allowing viewers to form their own interpretations. The filmmakers intentionally left room for individual understanding. However, those considering watching should not expect a straightforward focus on immigration; the film is complex, exploring various interconnected themes all tied to the Mediterranean Sea. The central element throughout the film is this sea, which separates Europe and Africa. It portrays people who rely on it for their livelihoods, upbringing, and seeking new beginnings. Yet, many viewers primarily associate it with refugees crossing the sea, a mischaracterization according to the reviewer. Roughly 20-25 percent of the film addresses that specific issue, depicting their struggles during the journey but not delving into its underlying causes. The reviewer suggests that one particular religion is responsible for much of the turmoil in the Middle East, which also explains the presence of Western military forces in the region. Certain scenes are genuinely disturbing. While acknowledging the risks taken by those attempting to cross the sea, the reviewer emphasizes they aren't a nationalist and don’t subscribe to divisions based on language or ethnicity. However, they express concern about religion, believing that its elimination—specifically one faith causing significant problems—would allow for peaceful coexistence. This is a core issue presented, though not explicitly stated by the filmmakers. > "The ships fired rockets and at sea. It was like there was fire at sea." Overall, the reviewer found it to be an average film, noting they’ve seen better documentaries on various global issues. The filmmakers aimed to remain neutral, simply documenting life in and around the Mediterranean Sea. Some aspects felt unclear or lacked a discernible purpose. The reviewer admitted to having numerous questions for the filmmakers. The film was Italy's submission for the 2017 Oscars and received a nomination for Best Documentary Feature. This was the first of five films in that category viewed, so the outcome remains unknown, although it was considered a strong contender by some observers. Regardless of its success, the reviewer doesn’t strongly recommend it to general audiences because it lacks clear narration needed for average viewers to grasp the message effectively. It provides only an overview of a critical contemporary issue, unlike the impactful storytelling found in David Attenborough's work. The film is confusing and potentially misleading; watching it feels like observing a news broadcast with the sound off. With more direction, it could have been exceptional. _5/10_

Source on TMDB