I’m genuinely perplexed by the low ratings here. It seems this film didn’t even attempt to be good, nor did it pretend that it was! This was an intentionally awful movie designed to amuse viewers through its awfulness. And surprisingly, it succeeded in doing just that. Awarding it a 3-star rating would be unfair, considering it accomplished what it aimed for. To guarantee both the badness and the entertainment value, there's a scene depicting a cartoon character assaulting someone. Yes, you read that correctly—a cartoon is shown attacking a human. It’s as if someone saw "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" and thought, “We can do something far worse.” They believed they could create a film so terrible it becomes enjoyable. And precisely that's what happened. It’s a perverse B-movie imitation of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?", except the cartoon characters are malevolent, placing it in a unique class all its own. It isn’t trying to frighten you, and even the jokes aren’t meant to elicit laughter. The goal is to be an intentionally bad movie that entertains by embracing every cliché of the genre. Therefore, I'm giving it a full 10 out of 10 stars—it established a target for itself and achieved it completely.

Source on TMDB