It’s disappointing that “Dragonheart” sequels haven’t managed to achieve the same status as the original film, which I previously discussed in terms of its popularity and influence. When a movie finds success like that, it almost inevitably leads to follow-ups intended to capitalize on it. This first sequel is so flawed that it would have been better if it didn't exist at all. While sequels often fail to live up to the originals—though there are exceptions—this one feels particularly underdeveloped and cheaply made, leading me to question how much effort the studio put into completing it. The film’s few positive aspects lie in some of its technical elements. The soundtrack is quite good, largely reusing musical themes from the first movie, and it attempts to be a fun, accessible experience for families. There's humor present, although many of the jokes fall flat: things like flatulence or drool are old territory, and handled much better elsewhere. Everything else feels substandard: the script, which relies on an improbable prophecy and a dragon’s egg left behind by Draco, is poorly written and full of issues. The action sequences exist, but they're generally over-the-top, uninspired, and hastily assembled, especially the ending. Even the sets and costumes suffer from excessive creativity, blurring the line between medieval times and something resembling Middle Earth. There are noticeable problems with the design choices for some of these elements. The film makes heavy use of CGI and computer effects for both castles and the dragon. However, this technique should have been used more sparingly, as it’s obvious that nothing is real. I can't recall seeing so many obviously fake and amateurish CGI visuals! The pacing also suffers from editing problems and other flaws in post-production. As for the actors, there’s not much to celebrate. The cast isn't strong, with limited talent and few opportunities to stand out. The dragon itself is essentially the main character, but even with Robby Benson’s decent voice acting, it’s unlikeable. Christopher Masterson and Harry Van Gorkum provide the most memorable performances; Masterson embodies a typical hero while Van Gorkum portrays a cunning villain. What do they have in common? They're both dishonest.

Source on TMDB