W2TCH

Deepwater Horizon (2016)

2016 • 1h 47m • Drama, Action • PG-13
On September 27, 2026
#847▲ 3595
847th by Pulse movie online
53.2PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on Deepwater Horizon

6/10 · Nov 18, 2022

The movie is quite well-made; it's entertaining and doesn’t feel exhausting to watch. Disaster films are plentiful, but I believe this particular subgenre hasn't been explored much in recent years. The story centers on an actual event where a large oil drilling rig experienced serious safety failures, ultimately catching fire and collapsing. Investigations revealed that the incident was due to issues with a team responsible for installing a cement lining within the wellbore created by the platform, alongside inadequate equipment maintenance—problems that could have been avoided if BP, the company contracting the platform, had prioritized costs and timelines less. The film delivers quality entertainment without significant drawbacks, though it's not entirely free from criticism. The script suffers from an extended introduction before the action moves to the rig; I felt the movie took too long to become engaging, wasting time on details that weren’t essential. Also, the ending seemed rushed and didn't address much beyond what was presented in subsequent legal proceedings. It’s clear Mark Wahlberg was intended as the central figure, but he seems to deliberately avoid taking a heroic or prominent role; his performance felt like one of his weakest and least compelling. I don’t want to question his abilities generally, but he's largely overshadowed by Kurt Russell, who deserves recognition for his strong work and consistently captures attention whenever he appears. Gina Rodríguez and John Malkovich also made worthwhile contributions. Peter Berg directed the film with competence; while there are some issues with pacing and editing that could have been refined, it ultimately earns a positive assessment, especially considering he managed to avoid turning what could easily become an over-the-top CGI spectacle into something reliant on effects at the expense of substance. That's a common pitfall for disaster movies—we’ve seen how damaging it was for films like “2012.” The visual effects are noticeable and impressive, but they don't overwhelm the story or make it feel entirely unreal. A successful aspect of the film's technical elements is the balance between character development and the gradual build-up of tension leading to the disaster. Realistic settings, costumes, and music round out the technical aspects of a movie that’s enjoyable without being exceptional.

Source on TMDB