W2TCH

Cars 3 (2017)

2017 • 1h 42m • Adventure, Animation • G
On October 3, 2026
#1760▼ 62
1760th by Pulse movie online
6.5PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto on Cars 3

6/10 · Feb 3, 2023

The conclusion to a series that never really captured my interest. I’ve never felt particularly compelled to watch the “Cars” movies. As I mentioned before, I was already grown up when they came out, and I distinctly remember feeling like there was an aggressive push behind them – almost like those door-to-door salespeople trying to convince you of something. "Cars" seemed to be everywhere, and the merchandise alone generated a massive business. Because of that, I chose not to see them; I dislike feeling pressured into enjoying things. I just finished watching this film, the final one in the trilogy. Comparing it to the first movie feels like an attempt at being fair. They're quite alike, though the original had something special because it was new. The stories themselves are full of familiar tropes: we’ve seen the tale of a young, noble underdog striving for victory before, and this one shows us that everything comes to an end, that there’s a time to step aside and let others have their turn with grace. It's about how generations change and the conflicts that arise. “Cars 2” felt completely out of place between them, featuring a character who barely appeared in the first film. Despite its predictability, "Cars 3" did manage to recapture some of what made the initial movie worthwhile. Still, even with its commercial and critical success, I don't believe it’s accurate to put any of the “Cars” films on the same level as “Toy Story,” “Up,” or “Inside Out.” Those movies demonstrated Pixar's commitment to originality – creating fresh stories and characters. That simply wasn’t present in "Cars." There are countless cartoons that include talking cars, even if they aren’t the main focus. It’s an old idea that Pixar has essentially revived and polished with their impressive CGI animation skills. Essentially, it felt like a way to make a lot of money without much creative risk. Once again, this film showcases Pixar's technical expertise—the incredible attention to visual detail and the high quality of digital animation we’ve come to expect. It would be disappointing if they couldn’t maintain that standard! The sound mixing, editing, and all the other production elements were clearly handled with care by talented professionals. The voice acting is also noteworthy, featuring Owen Wilson and others returning, along with Cristela Alonso. Everyone involved did a solid job. We've already discussed the script, so let’s talk about the humor: the film tries to be funny, and while the jokes seem appropriately placed, they just don’t land—they aren’t genuinely amusing. Attempts to create suspense or emotional impact also fell flat, largely because the characters are underdeveloped and lack depth, making it difficult to connect with them.

Source on TMDB