I wouldn’t spend my money to watch it. Fortunately, I attended a free screening previously...so at least I wasn’t out any cash ["I laughed, I cried, I kissed $10 good-bye!"--most other movies]. I viewed an early version several months ago, and while it was the complete movie, the end credits lacked music and might have undergone some editing changes since then. As far as what I witnessed, its quality is comparable to Thor: Dark World, and it exhibits a greater degree of progressive themes than Han Solo or Star Wars: The Last Jedi. It’s likely the worst Marvel film since Iron Man launched this cinematic universe; only an Inhuman movie could have been worse. Keep your money and perhaps wait to see it at a discount theater ($1.75 each...or maybe $3 maximum) or stream it for free, so you'll understand how this newly introduced character diminishes the plot of Avengers: Endgame. The computer-generated effects are merely adequate, but the simplistic storyline, uninspired performances, and minimal character development were sacrificed to position it as a leading film in terms of progressive messaging and identity politics…And Brie Larson’s character is simply dull, lacking any complexity—similar to how Disney handled the female lead in the current Star Wars films. Absolutely avoid spending money on IMAX or other premium showings, or waiting in line for opening night. A revised version of Ghostbusters was marginally better...which isn't a significant compliment. I’m already noticing highly positive reviews from critics, and I suspect these are the same reviewers who praised last year’s “The Favourite” and “Sorry to Bother You.” Yeah, steer clear of this one too!
On September 22, 2026
#467▲ 112
467th by Pulse movie online55.3PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →


