The narrative appears centered primarily on Jim Balsillie, a former co-CEO of Blackberry, relegating the contributions of the engineering team to supporting roles. This aligns with a common pattern in movies that tends to elevate business leaders while minimizing the significance of those who are responsible for creating and developing products—the individuals whose work provides real value to society. While the film generally adheres to the correct chronology and includes many key moments from Blackberry’s history, these events aren't explored deeply enough for viewers to grasp either the engineering achievements that propelled Blackberry to international success or the flawed business decisions that caused its decline. The technical aspects presented occasionally lack clarity and can be inaccurate; for example, it incorrectly suggests Blackberry pioneered push messaging, and implies their initial prototype materialized instantly. It seems likely that the script’s foundation is interviews with individuals lacking a technical background, or that the filmmakers were only comfortable portraying a story driven by prominent personalities. The film conveys mixed messages. On one hand, it reinforces the stereotype of engineers as unproductive hobbyists who require constant pressure from managers to produce results, disregarding technical considerations. Simultaneously, it attempts to depict the business executives as deceptive figures using empty promises and superficial tactics to conceal their lack of expertise and poor judgment, ultimately leading to detrimental choices that contributed to Blackberry’s failure. The writers may have intended to present Balsillie as a shrewd strategist, but judging solely by his actions in the film, he comes across more like an arrogant parasite whom the engineers struggled to remove. It's unclear why they initially involved him and other business executives—they likely would have fared better without their involvement.

Source on TMDB