_Black Girl_ (1966) is not a movie I enjoyed; it's simply bad. I anticipate facing criticism and accusations of racism, sexism, and even support for domestic slavery just for expressing this opinion as a white male. However, that’s inaccurate! And I won’t accept the argument that a film doesn’t need to be enjoyable to be considered good—that idea is inherently contradictory. There's essentially no difference between disliking a movie and calling it “bad” because they convey the same sentiment. It's likely that many people, regardless of their race or gender, found the movie disappointing, even awful. While I understand this film wasn’t meant to be entertaining, I still consider it bad and stopped watching it. Addressing important issues like racism, sexism, domestic slavery, and suicide is vital and should be brought to public attention, but portraying them in narrative fiction might not always be the best approach. Some people believe _Black Girl_ is a good film; others, like myself, disagree, even if I’m in the minority. I realize my opinions on movies, especially negative ones, are often dismissed as invalid. It's true that I dislike this movie and consider it to be of poor quality—that’s the distinction between disliking something and deeming it bad. These feelings are connected because disliking something indicates a belief that it is flawed. What I struggle with is when movies seem to “glamorize” things, which frequently happens even unintentionally. While visual elements can be enhanced, especially in pleasant situations, doing so during life-or-death scenarios raises moral concerns. When I say "glamorize," I'm not referring to making something appear happy; rather, it means presenting it as awe-inspiring, luxurious, and elegant. As a filmmaker myself, I’m careful about my own work and strive for balance. A good movie should be one you like and want to watch again. I watched this film twice, and the story still left me somewhat confused. I won't apologize for criticizing a film because it's an inanimate object—it has no feelings or thoughts. Nor will I apologize to anyone who attempts to prove me wrong. This movie is certainly **not** an “essential film” of the 1960s or today; it’s chaotic and frustrating garbage. Feel free to label me as you wish – racist, sexist, a supporter of domestic slavery, insensitive, ignorant, or even heartless—it won't change my position. I don’t tolerate easily offended individuals. I’ve experienced bullying in the past but won’t resort to suicide like the film’s main character did, although I can empathize with the racism she faced. Art is a matter of personal choice and reflects one’s values; I have my own values, and others have theirs. Art isn't inherently good or bad because those terms are subjective. While art doesn’t always need to be pleasurable—and often is, as it should be—this movie primarily aims to highlight the world’s problems, which I am aware of. If people want to perceive me as a racist, sexist, advocate for domestic slavery, and a cold-hearted monster, that's their prerogative. I know my own character. I feel sympathy for black women who experience such intense suffering.
On October 1, 2026
#39287
39287th by Pulse movie online1.9PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

