The movie Beowulf hasn’t stood the test of time; it appeared visually unappealing when it came out in 2007, and it remains that way even after 15 years. The film feels as though someone created a video game inspired by the epic poem—though not very faithfully—and then compiled all the pre-rendered scenes into a full-length movie. It would have been better if Beowulf had an option to skip those pre-rendered sequences. The characters appear with live action motion capture animation, but I don’t understand the point of it. Five years after The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, which was the first film to use a real-time motion capture system, that novelty should have disappeared; additionally, this technology hasn't aged well either. Even today, the most advanced motion capture can’t transform something into quality—the best computer-generated imagery is still fundamentally flawed—and combining the two just compounds the problem. It’s unfortunate, because a live-action film could be made with Anthony Hopkins, John Malkovich, and Ray Winstone – although not a good live-action Beowulf movie, since it would inevitably rely on CGI for Grendel, the dragon, and other elements; at least a completely animated version would maintain some level of consistency, or consistently poor quality. That’s not something one could say is present in Beowulf, though; some characters resemble the actors who voiced them (like Hopkins), while others don't even vaguely look like them (Malkovich). Then there's Winstone, who looks like a badly created digital version of Sean Bean.

Source on TMDB