I initially questioned why an actor like this was involved in delivering such a significant message for National Geographic, wondering if someone with more prominence—like Brad Pitt, Spielberg, or James Cameron—would have been a better choice. Then I considered that perhaps his visibility within the United States made him suitable to address the issue on behalf of his country, given the perception of the UN as essentially an American entity. This all started with a brief speech he gave at the 2016 Oscars, and watching this documentary now makes it clearer. He seemed merely adequate during filming, mostly going along with what was asked of him; much of the work fell to the film crew. However, the film itself and its core message are undeniably important. My gratitude goes out to the writer, director, and production company for their efforts. It’s not just an important film—it's exceptionally significant. To ensure broad accessibility, it has been made available on various platforms worldwide. While some viewers might feel inspired briefly after watching something like this, we can’t afford that kind of fleeting engagement given the urgency of the situation and the irreversible damage already done. As I mentioned in my review of 'Racing Extinction,' even small actions by everyone collectively make a substantial difference. The actor, designated as the United Nations ‘Messenger of Peace,’ embarked on a three-year journey to observe and gather information about the impact of human-caused global warming. He didn’t pose many probing questions to those he interviewed—who were often experts, scientists, or leaders—but the objective was still achieved, even if partially. The key thing to understand is that, unlike other climate change documentaries, this one doesn't attempt to present a complete overview of the topic; it’s primarily an observational record from someone chosen by the UN. > "If you consider this vastness of this universe, this planet earth is just a small boat. If this boat is sinking, then I think we will have to all sink together." At times, the film transcended that simple observation. We’ve seen debates in previous documentaries on this subject, but here, the perspectives were different while still conveying the same warning. The message will only grow more insistent if we fail to change our ways. He witnessed firsthand incidents and disasters from around the world—the kind of events depicted in a film like '2012'—and it’s possible that similar collapses could occur in the near future if we don’t take action now. The recurring theme across these documentaries is that global warming is real and happening presently, but who are we directing this message to? It’s for everyone on Earth, including you and me. I appreciated the film's emphasis on the fact that leaders respond to their constituents; they say what people want to hear. Therefore, applying pressure is essential, particularly in the United States. A shift in American attitudes would likely influence the rest of the world, as it has throughout the 21st century, although they currently seem behind countries like those in the Baltic region that are transitioning away from fossil fuels. The film's title alludes to a biblical story, reminiscent of Noah’s Ark. Do we need something similar if the polar ice caps completely melt? The answer is yes—something akin to what was portrayed in '2012,' though not for the entire world, but for vulnerable island populations. Coastal communities will relocate inland, while those inhabitants who bear little responsibility for this crisis may find themselves relatively safe on the mainland. Every living thing, whether on land or sea, has a right to exist just as we do. We need to consider things from their perspective because we control the Earth, not them. It is our decision what kind of future we create, and that future must include humanity’s well-being. The film has fulfilled its purpose; it's now up to us to act. Don't assume this is solely the responsibility of governments or corporations—we all have a part to play, however small. The collective impact will be substantial when we combine our efforts. Simply watching this film isn’t enough; we need to educate those around us, especially those who lack access to such information or struggle to understand it. This is essential viewing, and I encourage you to share the disc with friends and colleagues because keeping it stored away indefinitely serves no purpose. 'Before the Flood' exists, but there won’t be an ‘After the Flood’ sequel—we might not be around to make one. _9/10_

Source on TMDB