W2TCH
Batman poster

Batman (1989)

1989 • 2h 6m • Fantasy, Action • PG-13
On September 22, 2026
#645261
645th by Pulse movie online
54.9PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

John Chard on Batman

8/10 · Jul 29, 2016

The film didn’t entirely achieve what it could have, but it still serves as a blueprint of sorts. It was impossible for it to live up to the excitement surrounding its release in 1989; at that time, it was being touted as a movie with the potential to reshape cinema history like "Jaws" and "Star Wars," supposedly ushering in a new era of filmmaking. Despite this, audiences enjoyed it immensely, generating substantial revenue and leading to numerous sequels, although contemporary critics weren't overly enthusiastic. Revisiting it periodically over the years provides an interesting perspective, especially when considering Christopher Nolan’s financially successful “Dark Knight” films. I recall the intense promotion—the T-shirts and toys—that ensured the movie could never truly satisfy the enormous expectations. Honestly, I was somewhat disappointed after my first viewing. However, time has been generous to it, demonstrating that Burton possessed the insight to revive a genre without resorting to purely juvenile approaches. Visually, the film remains impressive compared to modern genre films; the sets are extraordinary, and Anton Furst deservedly received recognition for his work. Burton’s dark and atmospheric tone effectively captures both Gotham City's essence and Bruce Wayne's internal struggles. However, does the cast fully capitalize on what’s available?. Michael Keaton delivers a strong performance as the troubled and vengeful Bruce Wayne; it took time for audiences to appreciate his portrayal of the man behind the mask, but he is exceptional as the caped crusader, setting a high standard for those who followed. Jack Nicholson clearly enjoys himself in an exaggerated role as The Joker, and undeniably steals the show. This isn’t due to refined acting, but because, in a film centered on a conflict between two unstable characters, he embraces vibrant colors and amplifies the character's manic tendencies. Kim Basinger looks good, but her role as Vicki Vale is minimal—mostly delivering lines, looking frightened when necessary, and screaming convincingly, which she does well. Any other actress could have handled those requirements, and I’m personally glad Sean Young wasn’t cast in the part. The supporting actors perform adequately, and Prince's soundtrack borders on caricature indulgence. Ultimately, it's an enjoyable experience that honors the source material and provided a boost to the comic book film genre. Nevertheless, one can’t help but feel that Burton had a grand vision that ultimately wasn't fully realized—a regrettable situation that he himself would later acknowledge. 8/10

Source on TMDB

OPTIMIZE & SAVE

Find duplicate catalogs, cut unnecessary subscriptions, and get more from the services you keep.

Start Saving