A woman who develops feelings for a man in military attire should anticipate needing to move on quickly, or she risks experiencing considerable disappointment. The film’s visual presentation immediately stands out; few productions can match it. The landscapes are gorgeous, and the historical accuracy is remarkable—it's genuinely striking. The care taken by director Stanley Kubrick and cinematographer John Alcott deserves recognition, as does the quality of the costumes. I haven’t had a chance to read William Makepeace Thackeray’s novel, so I don’t have a basis for comparison regarding how the characters are portrayed. I understand some viewers feel that the film misses the humor present in Thackeray's book, but Kubrick incorporates satire related to the social hierarchy at the story’s center—at least it made me chuckle. The movie has a somber feeling, and because of its length, three hours, it could test some people's ability to focus. This places it firmly within the category of films best suited for a particular mood; I wouldn’t choose to watch it when I’m already feeling down, so that’s something those seeing it for the first time should consider. There are differing opinions about Ryan O’Neal’s acting, and since I haven't read the book, I can’t say whether he succeeded or not. However, he seems well-suited to the film’s overall tone, which isn’t necessarily a flaw. My biggest issue is that the narrative itself didn’t grab me; I wasn’t invested in what happened to the main character or the people around him in his increasingly irritating life. Is that Kubrick's responsibility? He certainly executed it with flair; the story just doesn't justify such an extended runtime, even when presented so beautifully. 8/10

Source on TMDB